🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are observing closely to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of countries are considering comparable measures.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that smartphones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' youth". Legislation is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have stated that an similar ban could be "a potential tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked parliament to enact a law raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has urged parents to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding motion supporting a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is given. Although it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a solid starting point," said the MEP driving the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Previously, interest built behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. However, the government committed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. One foundation founded by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after viewing harmful social media material argues that a simple age ban may not protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to build products and services that are appropriate and suitable for children," commented a prominent peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, regulation is mostly unfolding at the state level amid national stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further time needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced bills demanding guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from various politicians to copy the Australian example, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Outside of these regions, further countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, global organizations strike a more cautious stance. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

As this international conversation unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and others indicate that governments globally are increasingly content to delay for the industry to self-regulate.